|
Speeches
ABC RADIO
"Charting Australia"
Broadcast 2 March 1997
Hello I'm Heather McLean. Thanks for joining me for Charting
Australia. On the program today, a new strategy for scouring
away racist attitudes. And one day to clean-up the environment.
Also, before the Australian Cricket Team flew off to South
Africa they autographed a cricket bat for Charting Australia
to give away, and the details are coming up.
First shaking off the judiciary's colonial past.
MUSIC
MCLEAN: The neglect by Indian and Australian lawyers
of each other is 'tragic and puzzling'. That's according to
The Honourable Justice Michael Kirby, who sits on the bench
of the High Court. The highest court in the land.
KIRBY: Well, it's tragic because we have a common
legal system, we both share the common law. It's puzzling
because we both speak the same language, in court we have
the same approach to solving legal problems, we rely on the
same precedence in the sense that we've got the same technique
of judicial decision making, and this means we've got a lot
in Common. And yet, if you actually practice in an Australian
court, whether as a judge or an advocate, it's relatively
rare that you hear an Indian case sighted. The same is true
in India, it's very rare that you have Australian cases sighted.
So the point I've been making is that we should get to know
more about each other. We can do that now through information
technology, and we will find in each country a treasure house
that we can call upon.
MCLEAN: Although there are those similarities, there's
also such a different and political context in which the laws
have developed.
KIRBY: That's true, but many of the problems are
still the same. For example, we are both federations, we both
have written constitutions, we both have traditions of individual
freedom and political democracy. Although the social circumstances
are in many ways different, the basic law of contract is the
same, the basic criminal law is very similar, and so the basic
foundations of the legal system are sufficiently similar to
have analogies and assisting logic that we can call upon in
each country. We do tend to use English authority. The Indian
courts look to the English law lords for their guidance -
we do too. But instead of doing that, or in addition to doing
that in the future we should be looking to each other.
MCLEAN: And you've said before that you've personally
drawn on Indian law yourself, can you give me some examples?
KIRBY: Well, we had a very interesting case, when
I was President of the Court of New South Wales, concerning
whether officials have to give reasons to people who are affected
by decisions that they make -and that was a controversial
question which was undecided in Australian law. In order to
decide which way Australian law should go, or which way the
common law should go on this, I looked not only at the English
authority, and Canadian and United States cases (judge made
decisions), but also some leading cases of the Supreme Court
of India, and I found in those cases a great deal of guidance
and assistance. We can find assistance at the edges, at the
boarder land of legal principal where the courts are looking
at new problems, and looking at the way in which courts in
common law countries have solved those problems.
MCLEAN: So, what ideas do you have to encouraging
Australian lawyers for example, to look beyond their current
reference points and look to India?
KIRBY: Well, there are many things that can be done.
In a speech in New Delhi in October I listed, I think, about
ten or twelve things that we could do. One of them, for example,
is to have a chair of Indian law in an Australian University.
Curtin University in Western Australia springs to mind because
it looks out at the Indian Ocean and at India and the sub-continent.
We could also encourage Indian judges, retired judges, and
professors to come to our law schools and help teach Australian
students, and vice-a-versa. I, myself, have been appointed
an honorary visiting professor at the National Law School
in Bangalore in India, and I go there as often as I can. I
went there in January 1997 to give lectures on Australian
constitutional law and on common approaches to legal problems.
There was a great deal of fascination by the young law students
in India on the analogies and the lessons that could be learnt
from Australia. And I have no doubt that if the reverse were
the case, if an Indian judge were to come to Australia, the
law students here would also have their eyes opened to the
great wealth of experience, and in some ways the innovative
principals that the judiciary of India can teach us.
MCLEAN: The Honourable Justice Michael Kirby.
MUSIC
|